![]() ![]() J Emerg Med 2010 38: 362–365.Įl-Assmy A, el-Tholoth HS, Mohsen T, Ibrahiem el-HI. Color Doppler sonographic findings in penile fracture. Penile fracture: penoscrotal approach with degloving of penis after magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). BJU Int 2002 89: 890–894.Īntonini G, Vicini P, Sansalone S, Garaffa G, Vitarelli A, De Berardinis E, De Berardinis E et al. Penile fracture in Kermanshah, Iran: the long-term results of surgical treatment. Uygur MC, Gülerkaya B, Altuğ U, Germiyanoğlu C, Erol D. Review of Cleveland Clinic experience with penile fracture. Urology 1998 51: 616–619.įergany AF, Angermeier KW, Montague DK. Urethrography and cavernosography imaging in a small series of penile fractures: a comparison with surgical findings. Mechanisms predisposing penile fracture and long-term outcomes on erectile and voiding functions. Reis LO, Cartapatti M, Marmiroli R, de Oliveira Júnior EJ, Destro Saade R, Fregonesi A. Penile fracture seems more likely during sex under stressful situations. Penile fractures: the successful outcome of immediate surgical intervention. Penile fracture after intracavernous injection therapy. J Urol 1998 159: 1302.įazeli-Matin S, Montague DK, Angermeier KW, Lakin MM. Ruptured Mondor’s disease of the penis mimicking penile fracture. Development and evaluation of an abridged, 5-item version of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) as a diagnostic tool for erectile dysfunction. Rosen RC, Cappelleri JC, Smith MD, Lipsky J, Peña BM. Naraynsingh V, Maharaj D, Kuruvilla T, Ramsewak R. Penile fractures: immediate surgical approach with a midline ventral incision. ![]() Mazaris EM, Livadas K, Chalikopoulos D, Bisas A, Deliveliotis C, Skolarikos A. Trauma, gender reassignment, and penile augmentation. Ralph D, Gonzalez-Cadavid N, Mirone V, Perovic S, Sohn M, Usta M et al. Penile fracture: long-term results of surgical and conservative management. Gamal WM, Osman MM, Hammady A, Aldahshoury MZ, Hussein MM, Saleem M. Long-term experience with surgical and conservative treatment of penile fracture. Report of one operated case and review of literature. WB Saunders: Philadelphia, USA, 2002 pp 3707–3714.įernstrom U. In: Walsh PC, Retik AB, Vaughan ED Jr, Wein AJ (eds). Fracture of the penis: traumatic rupture of corpora cavernosa. Cent European J Urol 2014 67: 88–92.Ĭreecy AA, Beazlie FS. Traumatic rupture of the corpus cavernosum: surgical management and clinical outcomes. Rivas JG, Dorrego JM, Hernández MM, Portella PF, González SP, Valle JA et al. Penile fracture: surgical repair and late effects on erectile function. J Urol 1992 148: 1171–1180.Īteyah A, Mostafa T, Nasser TA, Shaeer O, Hadi AA, Al-Gabbar MA. The hemodynamic pathophysiology of impotence following blunt trauma to the erect penis. Penson DF, Seftel AD, Krane RJ, Frohrib D, Goldstein I. Penile fracture: preoperative evaluation and surgical technique for optimal patient outcome. Furthermore, postoperative psychosocial nursing and psychotherapy should receive more attention. In conclusion, the longitudinal incision may allow quicker return to sexual function but not necessarily improved the long-term clinical outcomes. Another patient’s score on the IIEF-5 declined from 25 to 24 points in the circumferential incision group 10 months postoperatively, and this was associated with maintaining an erection after vaginal penetration. One patient from each group reported symptoms associated with mild ED, but they experienced satisfying sexual orgasms after psychotherapy for 2 months. Six months postoperatively, the erectile functions of all cases were comparable to the level preoperatively except three patients. The mean (±s.d.) times required to recover sexual function were 35.6 (☖.0) days in the longitudinal incision group and 54.0 (±5.8) days in the circumferential incision group ( P<0.05). The mean (±s.d.) operative time was 19.1 (☓.9) min in the longitudinal incision group and was 45.1 (☖.5) min in the subcoronal circumferential degloving incision group ( P<0.05). Sexual function was evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively using an abridged International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) questionnaire. Fourteen patients underwent longitudinal incisions after ultrasound localization nine patients underwent subcoronal circumferential degloving incisions. From July 2001 to July 2014, 23 patients were identified with penile fractures. The objective of this study was to compare the long-term clinical outcomes from longitudinal incisions and subcoronal circumferential degloving incisions in the surgical treatment of penile fractures. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |